I have done half a day training with the Council for Christian Education in Schools to bring up to date my accreditation to teach Christian Religious Education in State schools. I am signing up to teach one class at week at the local primary school. Hopefully I will start next term.
The session was lead by a very skilled teacher who filled us with practical ideas for communicating the Easter story and its meaning to primary aged kids. I'm using some at our church's all age service this Passion Sunday.
At the training, another teacher was complaining that the agreed syllabus we follow "Religion in Life" was too detached or objective. She said it you wouldn't even have to have faith to teach it.
I can't agree with her concern that the whole process is soulless. CCES only appoints people of faith, one of our roles is to commend the Christian faith to the kids, and the examples of how to teach the Easter material were certainly conveying the meaning of Easter. Sure the focus was on the impact on the historical disciples but there were hints of what it means for us today. It wasn't a denial of faith but making the most of an opportunity to cultivate an environment in which faith can grow.
I suspect the teacher was confusing the roles of say a Sunday School teacher who is discipling kids in the faith, and a CCES teacher who is introducing children to the religious dimension of life, giving some understanding of the Christian faith and respecting children's rights to hold their own opinions.
I wonder if others with more experience with the syllabus have any thoughts on how subjective, engaging, faith-valuing the curriculum is.
Recent Comments