If you read my song you were either there for the class, completely baffled or able to read between the lines. But some of these themes a worth further comment.
One of the emerging themes from the corse was “Paroikoi” - being a resident alien - Like in the Letter to Diognetus (c AD120) that said of the early Christians “They live in their own countries, but only as aliens” and “They are in the flesh but they do not live according to the flesh.”
Affirming both the indigenous and pilgrim nature of Christian mission embodies the Biblical principle of being in the world but not of the world. Evangelists need to both inhabit a culture and be prophetically counter-culture, and I understand this will always requires faithful discernment to keep these in balance.
However I struggle with a tension here on a very practical level, that I am still trying to work out. Taking the idea of pilgrim literally (and the early church was literally geographically mobile) how do we live in a community being committed to its welfare – if we always intend to move on?
I lead a small missional team that has bought homes and moved into a fringe suburb to intentionally be Christ’s hands and feet in the neighbourhood and hopefully form a new church congregation. Yet what does it mean if I will move on in 3 or 5 or 10 years time?
The Old Testament prophets had to tell the exiles to stop making plans to go back to Jerusalem and put down roots in Babylon for the time being. Where was their Pilgrim urge?
How did Paul establish so many churches in so many cities if we was always travelling. Where was his indigenous witness?
Christ the Good Shepherd from the Priscilla catacombe


Recent Comments