I have been chatting with Alan Hirsch about his use of the "APEPT" fivefold model of minsitry over at Signposts.
So far we both that agree God calls different people to different ministries to enrich the church in its mission; that the church would be the poorer if it didn't allow these diverse God-given gifts to flourish; and that we need to legitimizing more than just the pastor-teacher roles.
On the basis of that, I affirm the need for allowing a "manifold" dynamic of vocation not just a "fivefold" dynamic. This number five feels too limiting – even arbitrary.
I respect Alan’s call to the church to discover more of its apostolic*, prophetic and evangelical ethos. I think he has discerned something significant the western church needs to hear - particularly at this time in history.
But why stop at just legitimizing apostles, prophets and evangelists along with the aforementioned pastors and teachers? What about exorcists or administrators or entrepreneurs? Aren’t these too Biblical expressions of missional leadership?
I catch something of Alan wanting to include wider expressions of vocation when he says church leadership is “at least” fivefold. So instead of saying the DNA of the church is “5+” wouldn’t it be more helpful to not limit it to five in the first place just say “LOTS”.
Alan could still recognise and affirm the apostle or prophet as underrepresented without tacitly ignoring the missional integrity of martyrs or some other missing vocation that also needs affirming.
*PS I have some questions about what is ‘apostolic’ but I will save that conversation for another day.





Recent Comments